Month: March 2012

  • QR Codes and the Costly Price of Marketing’s Cutting Edge

    In marketing, as in life, just because it’s new and popular, it does not mean you should do it. One of the latest trends in consumer marketing has been the use of QR Codes (short for Quick Response Code). The two-dimensional matrix was first created by the automotive industry but has now become popular with marketers. But even a great tool in the wrong application is too often ineffective.

    Interstate bilboard with QR code

    These codes are effective because they can hold a lot of information and are able to directly link smartphones to mobile-friendly websites where consumers can interact with a product or brand in a media and commerce-rich environment. My company, The A Group, has been successfully using QR Codes in marketing campaigns for a long time. While I am an early adopter of tools that might give our clients a better chance to communicate with their audience, I’m careful not to do something for the sake of being avant-garde. Pioneering technology doesn’t necessarily translate into being effective. Often, “cutting edge” means spending more, making mistakes, and paving the way for those who follow. That’s when the cutting edge becomes the bleeding edge.

    A QR Code on an interstate highway is not only a waste of money, it’s downright dangerous and potentially illegal. Can you imagine trying to scan a billboard with your phone at 70 miles per hour?

    Before you get enamored with the latest tool, gadget, or strategy (Not every organization needs an app; but that’s the subject of another post.), ask yourself these questions:

    Who is my target audience? Understanding your audience is critical in deciding which tools to use to reach them. If I’m reaching senior adults, direct mail might still be my best option. One of our clients gets an impressive 40% return on their mailers because of its aging demographics.

    Does it remove barriers? Effective marketing finds the most dynamic way to connect the target audience with a desired outcome. I saw a church bulletin with 10 QR Codes on its pages. Each code landed on the church’s website with the same information on it. Only one of them took me to an online sign-up page where I could register for an event. The church needed only one code. After scanning the first, most people would never scan another. “Oh, it only gives me the same information,” we all would reason.

    Does it ad value to the consumer? The best tools, apps, and campaigns find a way to give consumers something of value and in doing so give them a reason to engage and to pass the information forward. I bought a nutritional supplement which came with a QR Code that took me to a mobile-friendly site on how to use it for optimum results. The site featured video testimonials of fitness experts. I was able to scroll through different body types and find the one that I was most interested in pursuing and was able to watch the expert tell me about his exercise and nutritional program.

    What has been your experience with QR Codes? Have you ever used them?

  • Sometimes Failure is Inevitable

    Some risks you cannot mitigate. Some decisions you can take all the right steps, speak to the right people, do all the research and you still end up with a dud. Sometimes a very costly dud.

    risk risky

    A few years ago we hired a technology consultant who came to us highly recommended by a high-end technology firm that had recruited some of our best talent. His credentials were as impeccable as his experience. His previous projects were much larger and complicated than the one we chose to embark with his guidance. This guy was a total package:

    He spoke high-level Geek.

    He was from out of town.

    He was tall and confident.

    He was expensive.

    He designed a very, very expensive cluster of servers that were supposed to make our lives easier and serve our clients better. It was a failure. A big failure. It was a cluster alright, but not the one we had hoped. It no longer lives and its servers and parts are scattered throughout our offices. To this day we are sill paying handsomely for it. The cluster was an expensive and painful experience.

    Years later, I am reconstructing the events that led us into that wrong path. Time has a way of giving you perspective, and since enough of had passed, I was hoping to find the erroneous choice, the unfounded assumption, or perhaps even the lack of due diligence on our part. But as hard as I tried to dissect the project, the pathology report was clean: we did everything by the book.

    Life is risky. There are inherent risks in everything we do, and sometimes we fail–even after doing everything right. I know. It stinks.

    Maybe you’re wrecking your brain to figure out what you did wrong, and how you could have avoided a critical mistake. You might come to the same realization I did today: that was nothing I could have done differently that would have made this a successful project.

    Have you ever been in this situation before?