The Problem With Legacy Organizations

The essence of communication is to understand your product, your audience and to present your product in a way your audience can understand it. Simple, right? Well, not in my experience with legacy Christian organizations. First, let me define legacy organizations: movements, groups and churches that are in their second or third generations of existence.


Some critics have accused these legacy organizations of becoming irrelevant thus finding themselves in trouble trying to recruit new followers, fund their programs and budgets and survive, much less thrive, in current economic challenges. But that’s not what I see happening in the American Christian landscape. While some might be out of touch, most of these ministries are led by godly men and women who are passionate about evangelism and discipleship and are trying very hard to advance the cause of the Gospel.

So, what gives? Most legacy Christian organizations in America suffer, not from a lack of vision and mission, but most of them suffer from a communication crisis. Often they know what their missions are and, for the most part, they know whom they are trying to reach. Their failure, however, lies in communicating with their target audience in way it can receive the information. After decades of existence the tendency in these organizations is to communicate their story, purpose, and mission in the language and images of their founders. Seldom I see a legacy organization change the way they present themselves in a format that reflects new societal values and attitudes while remaining true to their calling.

After decades of existence the tendency is to communicate their story, purpose, and mission in the language and images of their founders.

While I’m not advocating changing your heart to appeal to culture, I am a big fan of contextualizing your message so it’s heard and understood by society. Every successful missionary has learned this lesson: you must speak a language your culture understands and can response to. Don’t wasted time arguing how people should think and behave. Whether you and I like it or not our culture is changing and some of those changes are difficult to understand–for example, how children who are born in Christian homes, attend Christian schools and when asked about if there’s such a thing as absolute truth, profess their belief in situation ethics: “my parents’ truth is not necessarily my truth.” I don’t like it, but I can’t ignore this trend if my job is to communicate with them. I need to craft my message with that reality in mind.

How do you know if you’re communicating your message properly? Go outside your bubble and tap into people who will tell you the truth. Find those whom you are trying to reach who are not insiders and ask them their honest opinion of how you’re doing. Ask them “how would you describe our organization to someone who never heard of us?” Or, “what do you think we’re all about?” You’ll be surprise by the answers if you’re brave enough to ask the right people.

Are you a part of an organization that needs to rethink its message? I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Orkut
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

5 Comments:

  1. Jonathan Landry says:

    My church needs to learn this lesson. We have a great youth choir, but they are dressed in robes that look like came out of 1955 and they sing songs that were written in the 80's. Those kids look so out of context. We are communicating with tools that are no longer appealing to young people today. Forget young; they don't appeal to middle age people either.

    February 15th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

  2. Anonymous says:

    I belong to a mission organization that would fall under the legacy description. You have described us in this blog: speaking the language of our founders. Our few young recruits cannot break free to do ministry the way they know would be effective. I'm afraid we're going to lose them if we don't change the way we communicate.

    February 16th, 2009 at 5:54 am

  3. jdantzlerw says:

    The church I have just started serving in definitely fits the bill. The question for us is how to we tweak our communication in order to reach new people without alienating our legacy members.I think that the main thing we have to do is explain to them not just what we are going to do but why we are doing it.

    February 16th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

  4. Uilleam says:

    If I were a follower of Isa (Jesus) in a Muslim culture, would I use the word "Crusade" or say that I am a Christian? Not! I would immediately alienate my audience. I would probably learn to speak a colloquial dialect as well.There is no difference in contextualizing the Message in this current Western culture. How would I expect to reach Goth or Emo, Indie or Gamer or any other group without speaking their language?Also, legacy organizations tend to reach out to others within their own context. Try being a legacy organization reaching out to a network of house churches. You don't even know where to begin and then end up hiring a consultant to help you recontextualize your message, because many of the people you are trying to reach are fleeing the legacy organizations and we don't really know why. Start asking questions.

    February 16th, 2009 at 6:24 pm

  5. Ron says:

    Well said Maurilio! Part of the issues of legacy organizations is that the founders or children of the founders are the still the stakeholders making decisions. They spend time wish things were they were what they once were. I am glad that when God created the world and we changed that He did not dwell too long on what once was but rather created a salvation direction and as you stated communicated to us on how to receive it. He understands a changing environment and works on our behalf. When a legacy organization changes, often the legacy org works only on its own behalf.

    June 30th, 2009 at 11:32 am

Leave a Comment